GB Writes

I write therefore I am/I am what I write


10-Reasons I’m grateful I never studied al-Islām in any Muslim-Country

A Necessary-Hujjah/Refutation against Tullāb-ish-Shaytān (Pupils-Of-Satan)

1. Most of these “Islāmic-Institutions”, via Muslim-Countries, teach al-Islām via a Minhāj (Mindset/Mindset) which isn’t pragmatic for the Modern-World.

2. A lot of what’s learned by so-called “Students-Of-Knowledge”, via these “Islāmic-Institutions”, via Muslim-Countries, etc. aren’t even applicable external of the Existence of al-Khilāfah/Islāmic-Governance (which the World hasn’t known since 1922, CE).

3. Most “Islāmic-Insitutions”, via Muslim-Countries, pontificate and promote Religio-Ethnocentric Supremacy (especially upon their Student-Bodies foreign to their Regions of the World).

4. Most “Islāmic-Institutions”, via Muslim-Countries, pontificate and promote Religio-Political Agendas.

5. Most “Islāmic-Institutions”, via Muslim-Countries, pontificate and promote Herd-Mentality which is convenient for Muslim-Governments to maintain Power&Authority via Totalitarianism (under the Pseudo-Auspicies of “Obey the Muslim-Ruler” Mythos).

6. Most “Islāmic-Institutions”, via Muslim-Countries, teach Concepts and Interpretations which’re Centuries-Old Recycled-Arguments (in order to keep Practical Islāmic-Knowledge Out-Of-Reach). Of course, this is done to keep People blinded and gullible as per the Corruption which ironically exists via Muslim-Countries themselves.

7. All of this so-called “Islāmic-Knowledge”, via Muslim-Countries, has been proven to be completely ineffective while remaining in the Hands of Religio-Academic Gatekeepers beholdened to Oppressive Muslim-Governments.

8. As per the so-called “Quality” of these “Students/Graduates” of these “Islāmic-Institutions”, via Muslim-Countries: I know for a Fact that I’ve benefitted my Society (as a Muslim) more than most of them and am probably more Islāmically-Knowledgeable than a lot of them overall (in spite of the Fact that I’ve never studied al-Islām external of the Land of my Birth).

9. The Curricula/Curriculums which most of these “Islāmic-Institutions”, via Muslim-Countries, contain Centuries-Old Recycled-Info. which one can easily attain independently on their own and by themselves without having to waste Time&Monies traveling to Muslim-Countries to “seek Knowledge”.

10. My Character forbids me from being a Participant in Religio-Academic Feudalism. Meaning, I refuse to co-sign Religio-Academic Gatekeeping via Religio-Elitism. And that’s precisely what “Student-Of-Knowledge” Culture actually is, by default/definition.

For More-Info. about the Evil of Religio-Academic Feudalism:

A Necessary-Hujjah/Refutation against Tullāb-ish-Shaytān (Pupils-Of-Satan)

The Religio-Pathology known as Religio-Academic Feudalism

Atharī Corleone’s Most Wanted: Gareth Bryant Versus the so-called “Persons-Of-Knowledge”

Gareth Bryant



174 responses to “10-Reasons I’m grateful I never studied al-Islām in any Muslim-Country”

  1. Weak superficial post comprised of cheap bullet points which aren’t explained or fleshed out at all. Just one line claims; basically a lazy hit and run. And the point seems to be justifying not really studying and distancing gullible people from the scholars. What’s presented as an alternative ?
    1. Most of these “Islāmic-Institutions”, via Muslim-Countries, teach al-Islām via a Minhāj (Mindset/Mindset) which isn’t pragmatic for the Modern-World.

    Absurd claim. Is aqeedah, tafseer and fiqh not pragmatic for the modern world?

    2. A lot of what’s learned by so-called “Students-Of-Knowledge”, via these “Islāmic-Institutions”, via Muslim-Countties, aren’t even applicable external of the Context of the Existence of al-Khilāfah (Islāmic-Governance) which the World hasn’t known since 1922, CE.

    False. How does aqeedah, tafseer or fiqh only apply if there’s a khaleefah?

    3. Most “Islāmic-Insitutions”, via Muslim-Countries, pontificate and promote Religio-Ethnocentric Supremacy (especially upon their Student-Bodies foreign to their Regions of the World).

    That’s a claim. Show us an example or don’t make the claim.

    4. Most “Islāmic-Institutions”, via Muslim-Countries, pontificate and promote Religio-Political Agendas.

    See above.
    “Most”.

    5. Most “Islāmic-Institutions”, via Muslim-Countries, pontificate and promote Herd-Mentality which is convenient for Muslim-Governments to maintain Power&Authority via Totalitarianism (under the Pseudo-Auspicies of “Obey the Muslim-Ruler” Mythos).

    Obeying the ruler isn’t a mythos. What about all of the ahadeeth which teach that?

    6. Most “Islāmic-Institutions”, via Muslim-Countries, teach Concepts and Interpretations which’re Centuries-Old Recycled-Arguments (in order to keep Practical Islāmic-Knowledge Out-Of-Reach). Of course, this is done to keep People blinded and gullible as per the Corruption which ironically exists via Muslim-Countries themselves.

    Classical texts don’t become obsolete. Why would a new tafseer be better than an old one? The reverse is true. That’s why ALL scholars are trained in classical books.

    7. All of this so-called “Islāmic-Knowledge”, via Muslim-Countries, has been proven to be completely ineffective while remaining in the Hands of Religio-Academic Gatekeepers beholdened to Oppressive Muslim-Governments.

    The most absurd claim yet. ALL Islamic knowledge has been “proven’ to be “ineffective”? What does that even mean? How is aqeedah, tasfseer, fiqh, or Arabic language somehow ineffective for teaching us how to practice our religion? And what do you have instead? This blog where you just rant and curse about all the things you’re personally mad at?

    8. As per the so-called “Quality” of these “Students/Graduates” of these “Islāmic-Institutions”, via Muslim-Countries: I know for a Fact that I’ve benefitted my Society (as a Muslim) more than most of them and am probably more Islāmically-Knowledgeable than a lot of them overall (in spite of the Fact that I’ve never studied al-Islām external of the Land of my Birth).

    Very arrogant claim. Humble yourself a little.

    9. The Curricula/Curriculums which most of these “Islāmic-Institutions”, via Muslim-Countries, contain Centuries-Old Recycled-Info. which one can easily attain independently on their own and by themselves without having to waste Time&Monies traveling to Muslim-Countries to “seek Knowledge”.

    This is just the same claim as point no 6 reworded.

    10. My Character forbids me from being a Participant in Religio-Academic Feudalism. Meaning, I refuse to co-sign Religio-Academic Gatekeeping via Religio-Elitism. And that’s precisely what “Student-Of-Knowledge” Culture actually is, by default/definition.

    Your character doesn’t forbid you from the foulness which is this blog, so it carries very little weight.

    This was just more self-important drivel, written in your characteristically unreadable style full of chaotic syntax, to not only justify not learning or respecting the scholars, but to also encourage others to follow the same undisciplined DIY path. No, you can’t really get far teaching yourself, and you’re a perfect example of why not.

    This mentality appeals to the young generation’s irreverent, individualistic temperament. But it just doesn’t work.

    1. Go suck a Dick: Hoe-Ass-Nigga.

      1. Beautiful akhlaq . You’re a shining example. So mad at how everybody else is living you have a whole blog devoted to it and how you have a problem with everybody, but this is who you are.

        1. You literally haven’t “proven” anything.

      2. You probably qualify for free help with your personality disorder. Take advantage of the perks of your job .

        1. You’re literally projecting everything whuch is Wrong with your own Personal-Life.

      3. It is amazing how fast the intellectual act dropped and the gutter talk started the second your logic was questioned. You write these long lists about having superior character, yet you fold immediately when you actually have to defend your ideas. You are using that aggressive “outlaw” persona to hide the fact that you have no real answers for the points I made.
        Saying my response somehow proves your point is a weak way to stay undefeated in your own head. You are just trying to avoid admitting you lost your cool and have no rebuttal. Linking your modeling portfolio and your own website bio is a desperate attempt to flex authority you haven’t earned in this conversation.
        You claim to be glad you aren’t part of the “Student of Knowledge” culture, but then you brag in point eight about being more knowledgeable than people who actually put in the work. You want the status of a scholar without any of the discipline or accountability that comes with it. You use your blog to demand respect as a teacher, but your character is just a thin veneer that disappears as soon as someone stops feeding your ego. You are just a guy with a blog who has a meltdown whenever he loses an argument

        1. What’s actually your Point?!!!

          #Precisely: you have no Point.

          Ironically, you’ve said a Lot-Of-Nothing.
          And, you still can’t “disprove” anything I’ve stated.

          1. That’s what you always do. You don’t engage with a single point, and just act like a child repeating “you said a lot of nothing”, or “Lot-Of-Nothing” in Gareth-speak.

            For all your macho bravado, you actually argue like a woman.

          2. That’s the “Best-Insult” you’ve actually got?!!! You’re a Bitch via Real-Life.

          3. Notice that this is a copy and paste template of every time you argue with anybody. It sounds exactly the same.

            It isn’t just with me.

            is it just a coincidence, an everybody else problem, or a you problem?

            Any time anyone criticizes you or anything you’ve written, you immediately just curse them out, and then claim they’re lying and repeat “so what’s your point? You have no point. You’ve said a whole lot of nothing”.

            It’s just a trick of yours, but you trick nobody but yourself. Any outside observer can see how you argue like an unsophisticated adolescent who hasn’t yet learned how to engage with the subject.

            Saying ‘you have no point” doesn’t make it so. Nor do all of your hashtags.

            it makes you look like you’re 12.

          4. You’ve literally proven you have no Point.

          5. I made a point after every one of the 10 claims you numbered. If you want to engage with them, they’re there.

            Just saying I have no point and going back to your usual “you have no point. You proved my point. Everything you said is a lie. I’m so smart. You’re jealous” etc. does not in any way even deal with a single point I made, much less refute them.

            Is that what you’d do in a live debate? Refuse to engage with a single piece of content and instead just say something sophomoric like your first reply, which i won’t even repeat because it’s just foul language, and then just keep repeating that your opponent has no point?

            That doesn’t actually win anything.

          6. No…you literally haven’t “proven” anything.

    2. Ironically, your Weak-Ass-Response has literally proven my Entire-Point.

    3. My `Ulūm/Islāmic-Learning is Public-Information. So, you literally haven’t even “proven” whatever “Point” you thought you had.

      https://www.gbwrites.com/about-gareth-bryant/

    4. Not only are you an Idiot, you’re equally a Liar as well. Everything I’ve stated, ironically, has been detailed directly via Prior-Articles of mine.

      https://www.gbwrites.com/religiofeudalism/

      https://gbwrites.com/gbreligioacademicoutlaw/

      1. Yeah you rambled and babbled more than once . So what? I’m lying about what ?

        1. Everything you stated is a Lie.

          1. Name a single lie.

          2. I only have to mention 1-Lie:

            You literally lied via claiming that I’m “Self-Taught”.

            https://gbwrites.com/about-gareth-bryant/

      2. “I have written many words, therefore I am right.” This is a way to avoid the vulnerability of a real-time debate where you would lose.

        1. (Ironically) neither you, nor anyone you think, has been proven “Capable” to “refute” any of my Religio-Writings.

          1. All you do is make claims which you don’t back up.

            And then you beat your chest as the undefeated champion.

            It’s sad.

            You’re a case study.

          2. Again…you know that you
            can’t refute anything which I
            write.

        2. In this Muqadimah/Introduction-Preface, I am actually addressing your Pseudo-Socio-Geo-Politico-Goon-Fantasy via/through this Risālah/Treatise-Expose. You literally just proved my point. Actually, you literally just said a whole-lot-of-Abāṭīl/Falsehood-Nonsense. What is actually your point? You are literally moving via/through a Mafioso-Theologico-Street-Thug-Discourse while being External-To/Outside of actual ‘Aql/Intellect-Reason and literally drowning in your own Hawā/Whims-Desires.
          I am actually observing your Athari-Corleone-Persona and it is literally actually just a glitching-robot-loop of Bāṭil/Vanity-Voidness. Why are you literally so obsessed with this Radd/Refutation-Take-Out and this Taḥdhīr/Warning-Censure while being so External-To/Outside of actual Murū’ah/Manliness-Chivalry? You literally just played yourself. You are actually out here role-playing a Mob-Boss-Theologian and literally calling people Hoe-Ass-Punks and Hoe-Ass-Niggas while actually pretending to possess a refined Rūḥ/Spirit-Soul.
          What is actually your point? You literally just confirmed my thesis via/through your own Fitnah/Discord-Based-Responses. You actually have no point. Like, literally, what is actually your point? You literally just said a whole-lot-of-nothing. Every time someone actually calls you out on your Bio-Socio-Theologico-Polemical-Nonsense, you literally have a total Jahl/Ignorance-Meltdown and actually start screaming “Slander” and “Lies” like a literally broken record. You actually literally can’t handle being wrong, so you literally misuse the Āyah/Verse-Command to speak uprightly and the Ḥadīth/Prophetic-Tradition to tell the truth as an actual justification for being a literally playground-level-bully.
          You actually brag about your ‘Ilm/Knowledge-Learning and literally call anyone who disagrees with you Jāhil/Ignorant-Stupid, but you literally actually just repeat the same three lines. You actually accuse anyone who challenges your Socio-Theologico-Mafioso-Frame of Ẓulm/Oppression-Wrongdoing, which is actually literally Literal-Garbage. You literally have no Maqṣūd/Point-Intent. You are literally a grown man. It is literally actually time to leave the Digital-Cinema/Imaginary-Trenches, put down the Ṣifāt/Attributes-Slashes, and literally actually just grow up already.
          #ViaTheReality #ExternalToTheGodfatherFantasy #LiterallyNoPoint #ActuallyNoPoint #LiterallyActuallyNothing #SocioPoliticoNonsense #GrowUpAlready #AqlOverHawa #AthariCorleoneIsActuallyLiterallyNothing #LiterallySlanderWhining #ActuallyNoAql #LiterallyActuallyDone #MisusingTheText
          Does this Bayān/Clarification-Statement hit the right level of Socio-Theologico-Absurdity

          1. You literally can’t “refute” any
            of my Religio-Theological Writings.

          2. You can’t disprove anything I wrote: Bozo.

    5. Most of these so-called “Persons-Of-Knowledge” only “study” al-`Aqīdah/Islāmic-Theology, as a Pseudo-Justification to impose Unjust-Takfīr against Fellow-Muslims. You’ve proven my Entire-Point: Again

      https://gbwrites.com/takfircultureisevilandcursed/

    6. Most of these so-called “Persons-Of-Knowledge” don’t even “study” at-Tafsīr. So, ironically, you’ve literally proven my Point: Again

      1. Nonsensical claim.

        1. “Refute” it then…#IllWait

          1. I refute it by pointing you to the curriculum of all Islamic universities. Your claim that most people who studied islam in universities didn’t study tafsir is disproven by that alone.

          2. It’s literally a Fact, that most of these so-called “Students-Of-Knowledge” haven’t “studied” at-Tafsīr (Qur’ānic-Commentary).

          3. Ehere’ve you “studied”?!!!

            Nowhere

            Who’ve you “studied” with?!!!

            No one

    7. Most of these so-called “Persons-Of-Knowledge” don’t “study” al-Fiqh (Juridicial-Analysis), they merely Dick-Ride Madhāhib (Religio-Opinions) of Muslim-Scholars. So, you’ve proven my Point: Again

      https://gbwrites.com/revelationvsscholars/

      1. Another nonsensical claim. They don’t study fiqh. How could anyone graduate from an Islamic university without studying fiqh. That can be disproven by taking a single glance at the curriculum and what’s required to graduate.

        1. Reading Fiqh-Books doesn’t equal “Studying Fiqh”. It’s a Known-Fact, that most of these so-called “Students-Of-Knowledge” merely parrot Madhāhib/Religio-Opinions and subsequently attempt to monopolize as well as manipulate Madhāhib. Again, ironically, you’ve proven my Entite-Point directly.

          1. Tell me what constitutes studying fiqh.

          2. Are you next going to claim to be a mujtahid?

          3. al-Ijtihād literally means:

            “Decision-Making”

            Individual-Ijtihād is literally done
            every single Day…what’s your Point?!!!

            https://gbwrites.com/ijtihaddecisionmaking/

  2. Too bad chaplains don’t get evaluated for personality disorders.

    I’d look into Cluster B.

    1. You’re envious, because you probably have a Job that you hate, because you’re not Intelligent enough to get a Career you want.

      1. The irony of attacking my intelligence while incorrectly capitalizing the first letters of words for no reason.

        English is your first language, and one you boast a lot about being such a talented writer in.

        Learn basic grammar and punctuation.

        1. Capitalization via English is Fluid,
          by virtue of the Nature-Of-English.

          https://share.google/aimode/0hCXdg9XBH8bG5IMy

          1. #actuallyliterally #predicatedon #ilm # #licensedkhalas #gatekeeping #haqiqa #minhāj #chaplainproblems #clinicalfeudalism #nizām #actuallyactuallyactually#literallyliterallyliterally
            🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣

          2. #HypocriticalIrony

            You can’t “refute” any of
            my Religio-Writings.

  3. Trust me, nobody is jealous of you. Nor impressed.

    1. Your Responses literally prove your Hasad/Envy.

      1. there is literally nothing about you I’d want for myself. Saying the word hasad in Arabic doesn’t make it so.

        This is another complex of yours. “everyone is jealous of me”.

        1. Your Responses literally
          prove your Hasad/Envy.

          1. Repeating yourself doesn’t make it true.

          2. #HypocriticalIrony

            You repeat the Same-Arguments,
            without any such Evidence.

            You’re literally the proverbial:

            “Pot calling the Kettle Black.”

  4. Why are you so full of yourself ?

    You don’t even realize how ridiculous you make yourself look.

    “My uloom” who even says something like that?

    1. “`Ulūm” litetally means:

      “Learning”

      “Studying”

      “Studies”

      etc.

      So, what’s actually your Point?!!!

      #IllWait

      1. I know what the word means. I’m saying who would say something like that?

        Does anyone with knowledge brag?

        Do you really see yourself as knowledgeable?

        1. Personally, I don’t give a Fuck
          whom considers me a
          “Person-Of-Knowledge” or who doesn’t.

          https://gbwrites.com/idontcareaboutreligiotitles/

          1. You obviously do care, or else what was the point of publishing it and arguing about it?

          2. I write whateva da Fuck I wanna write about

      2. And actually uloom is the plural of ilm which means knowledge, so it has the sense of “knowledges”.

        You’re saying “my knowledges are public information”. Are you impressed with yourself? Should anybody else be?

        1. You’ve literally proven that your
          Knowledge-Of-Arabic is Zero.

          “`Ulūm (Learning/Studies)” means Degrees, Types, Kinds, Branches, etc.
          of “`Ilm/Knowledge”.

  5. “only have to mention 1-Lie:

    You literally lied via claiming that I’m “Self-Taught”.”

    You said in point .9 :
    which one can easily attain independently on their own and by themselves without having to waste Time&Monies traveling to Muslim-Countries to “seek Knowledge”.

    So you’re claiming one can be self-taught and that it’s equal to studying under scholars.

    And what I actually said was ” No, you can’t really get far teaching yourself, and you’re a perfect example of why not.”.

    I did not say you had never attended any sort of classes ever.

    1. Again…your Response proves
      that you’re a Liar&Slanderer.

      1. You claimed one can be self taught and get the same result as going to study with scholars.

        1. Easily at that, you claim.

          1. Again…You’re a Liar/Slanderer.

        2. Again…you’re a Liar/Slanderer.
          That’s not what I said.

          1. “which one can easily attain independently on their own and by themselves without having to waste Time&Monies traveling to Muslim-Countries to “seek Knowledge”.

          2. Quote it fully…that’s not all of what I stated. The Fact that you deliberately only quoted what you wanted literally proves my Entire-Point.

  6. Get psychological help, Gareth.

    Bye.

    1. #WhateverNigga

      You’re a Bitch…via Real-Life.

  7. Subhan allah. This thread was difficult to read . I asked on the other thread before reading this one which is so much worse : why do you talk to people this way?

    1. I already answered you the 1st-Time.

  8. It’s the cursing people out and personal insults which I’m asking about.

    My concern is that as a khateeb, an impressionable young Muslim might start emulating you in this and go around cursing people out as well.

    Can you see where I’m coming from?

    Cursing people out and making personal insults doesn’t fall with “qawlan sadeeda”.

    1. Whatever I’ve stated against People:

      They’ve deserved it 💯%,
      and I don’t apologize for it.

      1. Honestly my brother, would it please you if you found a young man who attends your khutbahs begin to curse people out and call them the things you called people here?

        What would you tell his parents if they came to see you, as a chaplain, khateeb and role model, if they said ” we’re having a problem with our son Abudullah. He’s calling people names which are too obscene to repeat, and when we told him that’s not how a Muslim speaks to people, he said ” well Gareth Bryant does it, and he’s our khateeb at Jumuah”.?

        1. What’s your Point?!!!

          I say what I want.

          Neither yourself, nor anyone else,
          gets to judge how I respond to Direspect from Others posed against me. Your Aversion to how I respond to Disrespect isn’t my Problem.

          1. Actually, a Muslim is the brother of a Muslim, and we advise each other.

            None of us is above advice.

            I love for people to advise me and want good for me.

            Don’t you?

          2. There’s a Difference between
            Advice & Judgmentalism.
            You’ve literally proven to be
            a Judgmental-Person.
            You’ve the Audacity/Arrogance to
            attempt judging me, yet stated nothing
            against the Person whom tried to insult me.

  9. Texts only.

    “Reviling a Muslim is wickedness (fisq), and fighting him is disbelief.”
    — Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī
    — Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim

    “A Muslim is the one from whose tongue and hand other Muslims are safe.”
    — Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī
    — Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim

    “It is enough evil for a person to despise his Muslim brother.”
    — Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim

    “All of a Muslim is sacred to another Muslim: his blood, his property, and his honor.”
    — Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim

    “Do not abuse the Muslims, do not search out their faults, and do not spy on them.”
    — Jāmiʿ al-Tirmidhī (ḥasan ṣaḥīḥ)

    “Whoever humiliates a Muslim, Allah will humiliate him.”
    — Sunan Abī Dāwūd (ṣaḥīḥ)

    “The believer is not one who insults, curses, speaks obscenely, or is foul.”
    — Jāmiʿ al-Tirmidhī (ṣaḥīḥ)

    1. What’s your Point?!!!

  10. “The believer is not a slanderer, nor one who curses, nor one who speaks obscenely, nor one who is foul.”
    — Jāmiʿ al-Tirmidhī (ṣaḥīḥ)

    “Allah is gentle and loves gentleness in all matters.”
    — Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim

    “Gentleness is not found in anything except that it beautifies it, and it is not removed from anything except that it disfigures it.”
    — Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim

    “Whoever believes in Allah and the Last Day, let him speak good or remain silent.”
    — Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī
    — Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim

    “Allah hates obscene and foul speech.”
    — Sunan al-Nasāʾī (ṣaḥīḥ)

    “The Messenger of Allah ﷺ was never obscene, nor did he speak obscenely.”
    — Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī
    — Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim

    “A believer should not be one who curses.”
    — Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim

    It’s shocking to hear someone justify insulting and cursing people out with the ayah “wa qooloo qawlan sadeeda” or the hadeeth about speaking the truth.

      1. I don’t see this as a fair comparison.

        For instance, the poster above who you spoke to that way, they may have been needlessly confrontational or critical of you, but they certainly were not attacking Islam or the Sunnah or any of the salaf. They just criticized you and your articles or writing style.

        I don’t think that calls for saying something like “Go suck a Dick: Hoe-Ass-Nigga.”.

        If you have a son, would you be pleased to hear him talking to his classmate like that? If you got a call from the principal of his Islamic school saying he’d been in an argument with another child and said “Go suck a Dick: Hoe-Ass-Nigga.”?

        What could you say to him when he says “but you say it every day online?”.

        As a public figure and khateeb, you have to realize you’re an example to some people.

        1. Like I said:

          I’m not apologizing for anything I stated.

  11. More serious than this is translating ahadeeth with foul words in English, which are not at all the sense conveyed in the hadeeth itself.

    Islam is beautiful. Giving everything a foul cast is not serving well.

    Do you think it’s good for daawah when non-Muslims read this block and find ever article to be foul, and even the ahadeeth are translated in a foul, obscene way which is not at all present in the original texts?

    1. I know, for a Fact, that I’ve literally called More-Persons to al-Islām than you or Most-Persons you know personally. I know, for a Fact, that I’ve helped More-People than you or Most-Persons you know personally.
      So, what’s actually your Point?!!!

      1. My point is what I already said. Cursing people out, giving a foul cast to everything, is not good.

        Translating ahadeeth with foul words in English which aren’t at all present in the original text isn’t good.

        And how are you boastful above? That’s not good.

        1. Again…what’s your Point?!!!

          1. “what’s your point” on repeat does not invalidate a point.

            Just say you don’t want advice and won’t engage with anything and think you’re right no matter what.

            I just gave you many ahadeeth.

            And again, the foul flavour you give everything is not serving anyone well.

            You’re wrong to take the beautiful ahadeeth of the prophet salla allahu alayhi wa sallam and translate them into foul English words, when the original words do not have that element at all.

            And you’re wrong for cursing people out and insulting them just for disagreeing with you.

            Even if they’re wrong. Even if “well he did it first”.

            Please don’t reply to this with “what’s your point”.

            THAT is my point. What I just said above.

          2. You’ve literally just proved just
            how pathologically hypocritical you actually are.

  12. My point is do you want people going around talking like this saying “but Gareth talks like this”?

    Do you?

    1. No one says that.
      So, again…what’s your Point?!!!

      1. My point is clear.

        You’re not responding and repeating “what’s your point” is not meaningful.

        It’s clear you won’t even consider any input and are unreachable, which is an unfortunate position to take. it means you can’t benefit from your brothers coming to you, and instead are sure of yourself whether you’re right or wrong.

        1. You’re 💯%-Hypocritical:

          You literally have the Audacity/Arrogance
          to judge me, yet you literally gave People a Pass to attempt insulting me.

          1. “But he started. But he did it too”.

            We’re adults.

            And that person isn’t a public figure, they’re just some unknown.

          2. You’ve literally proven my Entire-Point:

            You’re 💯%-Hypocritical.
            There’s nothing Just about you.
            Your Bias betrays you.
            You either judge everyone,
            or you judge no one.
            You either give everyone,
            or no one a Pass.

          3. I’m addressing you because you’re a public figure and a khateeb.

          4. You’re 💯%-Hypocritical.

  13. Okay then, Gareth.

    This is devolving into needless arguing. Arguing isn’t good.

    May Allah forgive me and you. I won’t be drawn into arguing.

    But again, I advise you to stop translating ahadeeth using foul obscene English words which are not at all the sense of the original, and to stop cursing people out and insulting them.

    Take it or leave it.

    “The believer is not one who insults, curses, speaks obscenely, or is foul.”
    — Jāmiʿ al-Tirmidhī (ṣaḥīḥ)

    “I guarantee a house in the surroundings of Paradise for one who abandons argument even if he is right.”
    — Sunan Abī Dāwūd (ṣaḥīḥ)

    “No people go astray after having been guided except that they were given argumentation.”
    — Jāmiʿ al-Tirmidhī (ḥasan ṣaḥīḥ)

    “The most hated of men to Allah is the one who is fiercely argumentative.”
    — Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī
    — Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim

    “Whoever believes in Allah and the Last Day, let him speak good or remain silent.”
    — Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī
    — Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim

    “Gentleness is not removed from anything except that it disfigures it.”
    — Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim

    1. I translate however I translate.
      Your Aversions to my Translations
      aren’t my Problem.

      1. Translating it as “don’t be a dick rider” is completely inappropriate. That foul, obscene meaning is not in the Arabic at all. It changes the moral tone of the Sunnah and can mislead readers, especially those who rely on English translations.

        You can communicate the warning clearly and firmly without adding vulgarity. The Prophet ﷺ was always firm, direct, and wise, yet never obscene. Translating the hadith faithfully matters for da’wah, for guidance, and for preserving the dignity of the Sunnah.

        I urge you to reconsider how you translate immaʿah and other hadith. Accuracy and respect in conveying the hadeeth are far more important than shock value.

        This is the point I have been trying to make consistently.

        Do not be so fragile that you jump to offensive defense rather than look at the truth of what the advice is actually saying, or harping on “but that other guy”.

        Will it help if I say he was wrong too?

        Okay then, yeah he was wrong in the style he came at you too.

        Back to what i was saying. It IS my business that you’re publicly ascribing foulness to a hadeeth which is free from that. There is no obscene sense in the original, and by translating it as “dick rider”, you’re making it foul.

        That is not a just conveying of the hadeeth.

        1. “Imma`ah” literally has the
          Same-Meaning as “Dick-Rider”.
          So, again…what’s your Point?!!!

      2. Translate faithfully or don’t translate at all.

        1. I translate how I translate:

          I’m not “apologizing” how I translate.

  14. “No one who has an atom’s weight of arrogance in his heart will enter Paradise.”
    — Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim

    “Arrogance is rejecting the truth and looking down on people.”
    — Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim

    “The most hated of men to Allah is the one who is fiercely argumentative.”
    — Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī
    — Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim

    “I guarantee a house in the surroundings of Paradise for one who abandons argument even if he is right.”
    — Sunan Abī Dāwūd (ṣaḥīḥ

    1. You’re 💯%-Hypocritical:

      You’ve literally started an Argument,
      with me, on purpose.
      You literally don’t even care
      how pathologically hypocritical
      you really are.

      1. Do not be so fragile that advice is seen as arguing.

        We advise each other.

        I’m not above advice, and neither are you.

        You’re putting it in public, so I’m advising you in public.

        You’re not infallible. You need to be advised as much as me or anybody else.

        1. I never claimed to be “Perfect”.
          So, what’s actually your Point?!!!

  15. My biggest concern is not disagreement, criticism, or even firmness. It is how you translate the hadith.

    When the Prophet ﷺ says “lā takun immaʿah”, the Arabic means someone who blindly follows others without thought. Translating that as “don’t be a dick rider” introduces obscenity, sexual vulgarity, and street insult that simply do not exist in the original wording or meaning. That foul element is something you are adding, not something conveyed by the hadith.

    This is not a stylistic choice. It changes the moral tone of the Sunnah. It makes something dignified sound crude. That matters, especially when people who do not know Arabic rely on English to understand the Prophet ﷺ.

    Being direct does not require being obscene. Speaking truthfully does not require profanity. Translating hadith accurately requires restraint and care, not shock value.

    You can be firm without being foul. You can warn against blind following without sexualized insults. The Prophet ﷺ did so consistently.

    That is the point I have been making from the beginning. That the foulness is causing harm. It’s not called for. it’s not good.

    1. Imma`ah literally means “Dick-Rider”.
      So, what’s actually your Point?!!!

      1. No it does not literally mean dick rider at all.

        There is no mention of either “dick” nor “rider” in the term at all.

        That’s what would be required for it to be “literally”.

        That is YOUR interpretation, but it’s wrong, because it carries a foul, obscene, sexual sense which is not in the original. At all.

        1. You’ve literally proven that
          your Knowledge of Arabic is Zero:

          As per what “Imma`ah” means,
          “Dick-Rider” matches directly with
          the meaning of the Word “Imma`ah”.

          1. That is false.

            Neither “dick” nor “rider” is present in the Arabic, so how do you claim that?

          2. The Word “Dick” & “Penis” carry
            the Same-Meaning…
            …the Words: Qabīdh, Dhakar, etc.
            are Arabic-Words which mean “Penis”.
            So, what’s actually your Point?!!!

    2. Muhammad
      (Peace be upon them)
      stated:

      “Whomever boasts of their Heritage, as per how it was done via al-Jāhiliyyah/Ignorance,
      then let them bite-off the
      Penis of their Father & don’t sugar-coat it
      (don’t be metaphorical).”

      (an-Nasā’ī, Ahmad)

      So, what’s actually your Point?!!!

      #IllWait

      1. Immaʿah does not mean “dick-rider.” It means blindly following others. The hadith about fa-aʿḍḍūhu wa la tukannu is contextual, about prideful boasting, and is not a license for vulgar language. Translating hadith accurately and respectfully matters far more than shock value.

        That is my point.
        Translating ahadith accurately and respectfully

        1. The Meaning of “Imma`ah” is
          exactly what “Dick-Rider” means:

          You’re a Fuckin-Dummy.

          1. where have I called you a single name or insulted you?
            Do not call me names or insult me Gareth. Stick to the subject and instead of letting emotions control you and leaving the boundaries of how Muslim men discuss a topic.

          2. You’re an Apex-Deflector.

          3. Reviling a Muslim is wickedness (fisq), and fighting him is disbelief.”
            — Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim

  16. immaʿah does not mean “dick-rider.” It means blindly following others. The hadith about fa-aʿḍḍūhu wa la tukannu is contextual, about prideful boasting, and is not a license for vulgar language. Translating hadith accurately and respectfully matters far more than shock value.

    1. That’s precisely what the
      Term/Phrase “Dick-Rider” means:

      Yeah…you’re a Dumb-Ass via Real-Life.

      1. Do not call me names or insult me. I did not call you names or insult you.

        1. You’re an Apex-Deflector.

      2. Via real life? What does that even mean?

        I have still not insulted you or called you a single name. i don’t do that and won’t stoop to that.

        Do not insult me or call me names.

        1. You’re an Apex-Deflector.

      3. Do not insult me . I have not insulted you.
        “Reviling a Muslim is wickedness (fisq), and fighting him is disbelief.”
        — Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim

  17. Translating it that way changes the moral tone of the hadeeth and misleads readers. You can warn against blind following without being obscene.

    1. Like I said:

      I translate how I translate.

    2. You’re a Liar…no it doesn’t.

      1. astaghfirullah a liar about what? Im’aah does not mean dick rider.

        Wallahilladhi la illaha illa hoo it does not mean that,.

        1. You literally don’t even care how
          pathologically ignorant you
          actually are. Apathy is worse
          than Ignorance.

          1. You’re wrong for translating it that way. And you’re wrong for calling someone names and insulting him for calling you out on it.

          2. You’re an Apex-Deflector.

      2. Liar about what?

  18. when you curse or argue, people stop hearing you. They hear the anger, not the message.

    The hadiths don’t need to be made vulgar to make sense. Immaʿah is clear without adding shock words. You can warn, teach, and guide without it sounding harsh.

    You don’t have to prove yourself or fight every time. Calm, steady words will carry more weight than anger ever will. People will follow the knowledge, not the cursing.

    I’m just saying this because you matter, and what you put out into the world matters too.

    1. Like I said:

      I translate how I translate.

      1. Wrongly.

        1. You’re Pathologically-Ignorant.

  19. I’m no longer conversing with you:

    Your Stupidity can’t be fixed.

    1. You literally just confirmed my point via/through your own Theological-Writings. What is actually your Point? Literally nothing. #ActuallyNoPoint #LiterallyNothing #ViaTheReality #AthariCorleoneGlitching

      1. You can’t disprove anything I wrote: Bozo.

  20. What is actually your Point? You literally just confirmed my Thesis via/through your own Fitnah/Discord-Based-Responses — in other words, you literally have no actual Maqṣūd/Point-Intent. You literally have no forward-moving Argument, only self-referential recursive theatrical posturing that means nothing in Reality. Every time someone actually calls you out on your Bio-Socio-Theologico-Polemical-Nonsense, you literally have a total Jahl/Ignorance-Meltdown and actually start screaming “Slander” and “Lies” like literally a Broken Record on loop.
    You literally cannot handle being wrong, so you literally misuse the Āyah/Verse-Command to speak uprightly and the Ḥadīth/Prophetic-Tradition to tell the truth, but only as a justification for being literally a Playground-Level-Bully. You literally brag about your ‘Ilm/Knowledge-Learning and literally call anyone who disagrees with you Jāhil/Ignorant-Stupid, but you literally actually just repeat the same three lines, and you literally accuse anyone who challenges your Socio-Theologico-Mafioso-Frame of Ẓulm/Oppression-Wrongdoing — which is actually literally Garbage.

    You literally have no actual Maqṣūd/Point-Intent. You are literally a grown man. It is literally actually time to leave the Digital-Cinema/Imaginary-Trenches, put down the Ṣifāt/Attributes-Slashes, and literally actually just grow up already.

    #ViaTheReality #ExternalToTheGodfatherFantasy #ActuallyNoPoint #LitReallyNoPoint #SocioPoliticoNonsense #GrowUpAlready #AqlOverHawa #AthariCorleoneIsActuallyLiterallyNothing #ActuallyNoAql #ActuallyLiterallyNothing #MisusingTheText

    1. You can’t disprove anything I wrote: Bozo.

  21. You literally keep presenting yourself as if you are fully trained in Ulūm/علوم while literally External-To/Outside of actual Ṭalab/طلب-‘Ilm and Ṣaḥīḥ/صحيح scholarly mastery. Every Lafẓ/لفظ, Maʿnā/معنى, and Maqṣad/مقصد you invoke is literally just performed as if it transmutes Online-Class/درس-افتراضي attendance into actual Scholarly-Authority/سلطة-علمية. Literally. Literally. Literally.
    You literally wave every minor Participation/مشاركة like it is Burhān/برهان while literally External-To/Outside of actual Ijtihād/اجتهاد or Ṭalab/طلب-‘Ilm. Literally everything is recursive Digital-Mafioso-Theologico-Performance with zero actual Maqṣūd/Point-Intent. Literally. Literally. Literally.
    And here is the Point: I can literally produce infinite Risālahs/Treatise-Expositions in your exact style, citing every Online-Class/درس-افتراضي and Seminar/ندوة as if it grants Scholarly-Authority/سلطة-علمية. Literally infinite. Literally actually. Lafẓ/لفظ slash Maʿnā/معنى slash Maqṣad/مقصد slash recursive “literally actually” loops slash pretentious compounds slash hashtags. Literally zero Weight/وزن beyond performance.
    You literally just proved it: the entire Scholarly-Persona/شخصية-علمية façade is recursive vanity, entirely External-To/Outside of actual Aql/عقل, Ṭalab/طلب-‘Ilm, or Ijtihād/اجتهاد. Literally. Literally. Literally. #LiterallyNothing #ActuallyNoPoint #ViaTheReality #AthariCorleoneGlitching #InfiniteMirrorParody #UlūmFacade #DigitalMafiosoTheologico

    1. #HypocriticalIrony

      You literally can’t “disprove”
      anything I wrote: Bozo.

      1. Every “assertion” you repeat literally confirms zero forward-moving Maqṣūd/Point-Intent. Lafẓ/لفظ, Maʿnā/معنى, Maqṣad/مقصد, Taḥdhīr/تحذير — all for recursive vanity. Literally. #ActuallyNoPoint #AthariCorleoneLooping #LiterallyNothing

        1. #HypocriticalIrony

          You literally can’t “disprove”
          anything I wrote: Bozo.

      2. So we have external to and via instead of just inside and outside down pat. We have needlessly using Arabic words with hyphens and your own translations.

        Oh, I know ! Predicated on ! Another favourite Gareth trick to sound smart .

        Let’s go !

        I’m better at being Gareth than Gareth .

        إذا عرف السبب بطل العجب

        Once the means/ reason is known, amazement ceases

        1. #HypocriticalIrony

          You literally can’t “disprove”
          anything I wrote: Bozo.

      3. #actuallyliterally #predicatedon #ilm #licensedkhalas #gatekeeping #haqiqa #minhāj #chaplainproblems #clinicalfeudalism #nizām #actuallyactuallyactually#literallyliterallyliterally
        🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣

        1. #HypocriticalIrony

          You can’t “refute” any of
          my Religio-Writings.

  22. You literally construct your entire Social-Critique/النقد-الاجتماعي Predicated-On/مستند-إلى the illusion of mastery while literally drifting External-To/Outside of actual Ṭalab/طلب-‘Ilم or Maqṣūd/مقصد. Every Lafẓ/لفظ you deploy, every Maʿnā/معنى you trumpet, every Maqṣad/مقصد you invoke is literally Predicated-On/مستند-إلى self-reinforcing Hawā/هوى loops of Recursive-Vanity/غرور-متكرر.
    Every citation of minor Participation/مشاركة or Online-Class/درس-افتراضي is literally Predicated-On/مستند-إلى turning the trivial into Pretentious-Ulūm/علوم-Grandiose. Literally. Literally. Literally. Every hashtag, every slash-compound, every rhetorical flourish is Predicated-On/مستند-إلى a theater of Socio-Theologico-Mafioso-Performance-Art External-To/Outside of any Burhān/برهان or substantive Aql/عقل.
    إذا عرف السبب بطل العجب
    Once the Means/سبب is known, amazement ceases Predicated-On/مستند-إلى observing the recursive loop of Athari-Corleone-Glitching Predicated-On/مستند-إلى the endless inflation of trivial accomplishments Predicated-On/مستند-إلى digital self-reinforced Ilm/علم without actual Ṭalab/طلب-‘Ilم rigor.
    Literally anyone could literally churn out infinite Risālah/رسالة-Expositions in this exact style Predicated-On/مستند-إلى Lafẓ/لفظ slash Maʿnā/معنى slash Maqṣad/مقصد slash recursive literally actually loops slash absurdly pretentious compounds slash hashtags and literally it would look indistinguishable from your Social-Critique/النقد-الاجتماعي. Literally zero Weight/وزن. Literally zero Argument.
    #PredicatedOnVanity #LiterallyNothing #InfiniteMirrorParody #ViaTheReality #ExternalToEverything #AthariCorleoneGlitching #LiterallyActuallyNothing #DigitalTrenchesLoop

    1. #HypocriticalIrony

      You literally can’t “disprove”
      anything I wrote: Bozo.

      1. Gareth Bryant Needs To Quit It Avatar
        Gareth Bryant Needs To Quit It

        Share this with your employers and get back to us .

        You won’t because you know you’d be let go for being unstable .

        At the very least, there would be a memo and meeting out of concern for your mental health.

        You can’t be in the helping professions while this unhinged yourself .

        Don’t bother with your broken record insanity hashtags and claiming I somehow “literally proved your point , or have no point , or say a whole lot of nothing , or just cursing me out like an angry adolescent having a tantrum.

        Prove me wrong by sharing it with your employers.

        It’s normal for professionals to share their hobbies with their bosses .

        If it’s a sane , normal hobby .

        You know this hobby is unhinged lunacy .

        I dare you to show it to them if I’m not telling the truth.

        Maybe you’ll get the help you need .

        1. #HypocriticalIrony

          You can’t “refute” any of
          my Religio-Writings.

          1. Gareth Bryant Needs To Quit It Avatar
            Gareth Bryant Needs To Quit It

            Called it .

            🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣

          2. #HypocriticalIrony

            You can’t “refute” any of
            my Religio-Writings.

          3. Gareth Bryant Needs To Quit It Avatar
            Gareth Bryant Needs To Quit It

            Yes or no will you share your “Religio-writings “ aka psychotic rants with your employers?

            Including the comments section .

            Just yes or no don’t deflect with more of the broken record it makes you sound like a child .

            “You literally just proved my whole point you literally can’t refute my religio-writings “.

            Show them to your employers if you’re proud of them .

            You can’t because you know you sound nuts.

            Your “religio-writings “ sound like the diary of a mental patient .

          4. #HypocriticalIrony

            You can’t “refute” any of
            my Religio-Writings.

      2. #actuallyliterally #predicatedon #ilm #licensedkhalas #gatekeeping #haqiqa #minhāj #chaplainproblems #clinicalfeudalism #nizām #actuallyactuallyactually#literallyliterallyliterally#hillarybanks#iwastotallymortified
        🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣

        1. #HypocriticalIrony

          You can’t “refute” any of
          my Religio-Writings.

  23. #HypocriticalIrony

    You literally can’t “disprove”
    anything I wrote: Bozo.

  24. Gareth Bryant Needs To Quit It Avatar
    Gareth Bryant Needs To Quit It

    Even the أشاعرة sounded sane compared to you, yet you were so proud of just being a child .

    They told you to just come talk to them without all the extra nonsense but you can’t do anything but this childish insane rambling .

    I just showed how easy it was for me to write the same kind of stuff and outdo you in sounding like you .

    It’s nothing to be proud of .

    I can churn these out by the thousands . So what ?

    1. #HypocriticalIrony

      You can’t “refute” any of
      my Religio-Writings.

  25. Gareth Bryant Needs To Quit It Avatar
    Gareth Bryant Needs To Quit It

    Actually / the Haqīqa (Truth/Truth) of this Mas’ala (Issue/Issue) is literally predicated on / actually predicated on / literally predicated on the Wāqi’ (Reality/Reality) that a “Concentration” is not an Ijāza (License/License).
    Most “Psychotherapy-Titles” / via “State-Laws” / are actually predicated on / literally predicated on / actually predicated on a Niẓām (System/System) of “Religio-Academic Gatekeeping” which requires a specific Sanad (Chain-of-Certification).
    Even if a Chaplain has a Tarkīz (Concentration/Concentration) in “Psychotherapy” / they are literally actually forbidden from using the Title “Psychotherapist” external of the Siyāq (Context/Context) of their Religious-Institution.
    This is actually predicated on the Haqīqa (Truth/Truth) that “Psychotherapy” is a protected Iṣṭilāḥ (Terminology/Terminology) / and using it without a Rukhṣa (Permit/Permit) is literally actually Mamnu’ (Forbidden/Forbidden) / which leads to Mashākil (Legal-Troubles/Legal-Troubles).
    Most “Chaplains” / via their “Pastoral-Training” / are literally actually “Students-Of-Knowledge” who provide Irshād (Guidance/Guidance) / but they cannot provide a Tashkhīṣ (Clinical-Diagnosis) which is literally actually predicated on / actually predicated on / literally predicated on “Clinical-Supremacy”.
    To use the Title / you literally actually have to participate in “Religio-Academic Feudalism” / by getting a “Clinical-Degree” / and clocking thousands of Sā’āt (Hours/Hours) of Ishrāf (Supervision/Supervision) / and passing the “State-Imtiḥān” (Exam/Exam).
    I know for a Faqt (Fact/Fact) that many “Chaplains” are more Nafsiyyan-Knowledgeable (Psychologically-Knowledgeable) than “Licensed-Graduates” / but the Qānūn (Law/Law) doesn’t care about your ‘Ilm (Knowledge/Knowledge) / it only cares about your Waraq (Paperwork/Paperwork).
    #actuallyliterally #predicatedon #ilm #yaqīn #licensedkhalas #gatekeeping #haqiqa #minhāj #chaplainproblems #clinicalfeudalism #nizām #actuallyactuallyactually

    1. #HypocriticalIrony

      You can’t “refute” any of
      my Religio-Writings.

  26. Gareth Bryant Needs To Quit It Avatar
    Gareth Bryant Needs To Quit It

    See ? Anybody can pull the same trick as you.

    It’s not an accomplishment

    Show it to your boss if I’m wrong and you think you sound sane , including the comments sections where you go nuts .

    1. #HypocriticalIrony

      You can’t “refute” any of
      my Religio-Writings.

  27. al-Radd al-Mufaṣṣal/Detailed-Refutation

    This Entire-Discourse is literally and actually predicated upon Persona-Mythology rather than Ḥaqīqah/Objectivity.

    Let’s unpack that via Taḥlīl/Analysis.

    When Immaʿah/Blind-Follower becomes Immaʿah/Dick-Rider, that is not Tarjamah/Translation. That is Iḍāfah/Addition. That is Isqāṭ/Psychological-Projection onto the Naṣṣ/Text.

    Literally.

    Actually.

    The Word Immaʿah is predicated upon Tabaʿiyyah/Uncritical-Following. It is rooted in Taqlīd-without-Tafakkur. It is not Dhakar/Penis. It is not Qabīḍh/Penis. It is not any ʿUdw/Jismī-Anatomical-Reference whatsoever.

    Zero.

    So when Anatomical-Slang is injected into Ḥadīth and then marketed as Linguistic-Authenticity, what is that actually predicated upon?

    Lisān al-ʿArab/Lexical-Authority?

    Or Shock-Value-Branding?

    Let’s explore al-Tanāquḍ/Contradiction.

    You condemn “Religio-Academic Feudalism” yet simultaneously construct Gareth-Bryant-as-Outlaw-Icon. You reject Hierarchy yet assert Intellectual-Supremacy 9/10 Times. You denounce Pulling-Rank yet repeatedly establish Dominance-Rank.

    That is literally and actually predicated upon Counter-Elitism dressed as Anti-Elitism.

    You reject Personality-Worship yet cultivate Persona-Cultivation. You denounce al-Immaʿtiyyah/Groupie-Culture while narrating Self-as-Religio-Academic-Robin-Hood.

    That is not Deconstruction.

    That is Rebranding.

    Literally.

    Actually.

    If al-Naṣīḥah/Sincere-Counsel is the Claimed-Manhaj/Methodology, then al-Lafẓ/Word-Choice must align with al-Amānah/Scholarly-Trust. You cannot declare Loyalty to Rasūl Allāh ﷺ while filtering Ḥadīth through Contemporary-Vulgar-Slang and then claiming that is “keeping it Real.”

    Keeping-it-Real is not a Uṣūl/Principle of Tafsīr.

    Accuracy is.

    If every Critique is immediately categorized as Hasad/Envy or Khawf/Intimidation, then the entire Framework is literally and actually predicated upon Nafsi-Defense-Mechanisms.

    Because once Opposition equals Envy, Self-Examination becomes unnecessary.

    And that is not ʿIlm/Knowledge.

    That is Ego-Insulation.

    Let’s address al-Mazʿam/Claim.

    If Immaʿah means Blind-Follower, then render it Blind-Follower. If it refers to unthinking allegiance, then say unthinking allegiance. The Prophetic-Warning stands on its own Ḥujjah/Proof. It does not require Anatomical-Embellishment.

    Unless, of course, the Delivery-System itself is predicated upon Provocation-Strategy.

    If so, call it Provocation.

    But do not call it Tarjamah.

    Literally.

    Actually.

    Because Tarjamah is Amānah.

    And Amānah is not predicated upon Swagger-Performance-Discourse.

    It is predicated upon Precision.

    Full stop.

    also it’s” Qadhīb” not “Qabīḍh”, but none of that has anything to do with “im’ah”.

    1. #HypocriticalIrony

      You can’t “refute” any of
      my Religio-Writings.

Leave a Reply to Mardani Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *