al-Muqaddimah/Prelude
This-Risālah/Article is the Direct-Result of a Theological-Convo between Gareth Bryant and Tālib Nathaniel: the Siblings of the Pen. As per the Convo, Tālib had indirectly invited me to a hypothetical/suggestive Majlis/Sitdown with Certain-Persons we both know directly&indirectly. The Maslahah/Purpose for such a Majlis was related to me concerning utilizing the Theological-Work of at-Tahāwī which in All-Truthfulness/Honesty is wellknown/respected amongst Religio-Theological Ahzāb/Groups.
Here’s how That-Convo landed
Atharī Corleone’s Most Wanted: The “Allah doesn’t exist in a Place.” and the “Allah doesn’t exist in the 6 Directions” Arguments which Ash`arīs use to accuse Fellow-Muslims of committing ash-Shirk (Association)
Here’s the Aftermath of That-Convo
10-Reasons I’m grateful I never studied al-Islām in any Muslim-Country
This was certainly something to Wake-Up to via Text-Messages: that went Left, now didn’t it?!!!
Now, clearly, there’s just Certain-Persons whom may not have deem me saying “Fuck at-Tahāwī” very kindly. Ironically, this also included Tālib Nathaniel. Tālib Nathaniel, whose `Ulūm (Islāmic-Academia) I genuinely respect highly, as they respect my `Ulūm in kind: they were sincerely taken aback via my “Fuck at-Tahāwī” Statement. At first, they thought I was Jokin. But, as soon as they realized I was Dead-Ass-Serious, they immediately Switched-Gears and told me Word4Word: “I can get behind dat Shaykh.” “I think you made a Mistake wit this.”.
But…of course with Gareth Bryant being Atharī Corleone: I meant what I said, and the Reasons how/why I said it. I deliberately said it because:
a. These `Aqā’id/Theological-Sects can easily be resolved, if Muslims refer back to The Qur’ān which instructs Muslims on what to do when we experience al-Ikhtilāf/Differing between each other.
b. Niggas don’t wanna use the Book-Of-Allah, as a Furqān/Criterion seperating al-Haqq (Truth) from al-Bātil (Falsehood). They’d rather milk the Opportunities to pseudo monopolize their `Ibārāt (Theological-Interpretations).
c. These Hoe-Ass-Sectarians would rather be divided upon al-Madhāhib/Religio-Opinions, as opposed to being united via at-Tanzīl/Revelation.
(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.4, V.59; Chpt.18, V.54; al-Bukhārī; Abū-Dāwūd)
Hizbī/Sectarian-Favoritism
The Statements of Allah vs. the Statements of “The Scholars”: The Anatomy of Personality-Worship amongst Muslims towards “Persons-Of-Knowledge”
Oh…don’t worry: this actually gets funnier
10-Reasons I’m grateful I’m not considered a “Person-Of-Knowledge”
There really exists Certain-Muslims whom attempt to dismiss Religio-Concepts, because generally they actually think/feel that These-Concepts are completely invented via Human-Whims. And, obviously, this isn’t true nor honest. However, to the Blinded-Eye:
“Perception is Reality.”
“It ain’t about what it is, it’s about what it looks like.”
etc.
And, sadly, it looks like these Islāmic-Concepts are “Manmade” via the Minds&Hearts of Countless-Muslims.
And, it’s the Blame&Fault of these Fake-Tullāb/Students of Knowledge, these Fake-Shaykhs, etc. whom directly steer Certain-Muslims away from al-`Ilmiyyah (Islāmic-Knowledge).
The Religio-Pathology known as Religio-Academic Feudalism
Concepts/Terms which Muslims attempt to monopolize for their own Sectarian-Agendas
Now…Back to this “Blackballing Gareth Bryant” Business
Atharī Corleone’s Most Wanted: Pagan-Arabs without the Shirk (Analyzing The Niggadelphia-Effect)
Gareth Bryant Versus these so-called “Persons-Of-Knowledge”
Gareth Bryant
Leave a Reply to Mardani Cancel reply