GB Writes

I write therefore I am/I am what I write


Refutation against the Propagation of the “4-Madhāhib/Schools” Mythos

Allah states:

“Those whom believe pay attention: Revere Allah & speak a Straight-Word.”

(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.33, V.70)

Muhammad (Peace be upon them) stated:

“Always speak Truth, even if it’s bitter (even if it rubs People the Wrong-Way).”

(ibn-Hibbān&al-Bayhaqī)

al-Muqaddimah/Prelude

This-Risālah/Article is based upon the Dhi`f/Flaw of ibn-Rajab al-Hanbalī, via their Work Titled “The Refutation Of Those Who Do Not Follow The Four Schools”.

The Problem with the Aforementioned-Book

The Book-Title alone, by itself, is highly problematic as well as extremely dangerous. This is for the Following-Asbāb/Reasons. I’ll be detailing the Asbāb I’m directly referring to.

Number-1

There’s 8-Surviving Madhāhib/Legal-Schools…they are:

al-Ja`fariyyah/Ja`farism

az-Zaydiyyah/Zaydism

al-Hanafiyyah/Hanafism

al-Mālikiyyah/Mālikism

ash-Shāfi`iyyah/Shāfi`ism

al-Hanbaliyyah/Hanbalism

al-Ibādhiyyah/Ibādhism

azh-Zhāhiriyyah/Zhāhirism

al-Fiqh/Religio-Legal Analysis

Number-2

For anyone to impose any “Hujjah/Refutation” against any Fellow-Muslim for not adhering to the “4-Schools”. My Nigga…which “4-Schools” are you even talking about?!!! Make that Goofy-Shit make Sense. Like, who’re you to get to choose which 4/8-Madhāhib are the “Supreme-Madhāhib” to follow?!!! And, what if someone is following one of the 8-Madhāhib not of one’s 4 “Selected-Madhāhib”?!!! What then…are they to be “Refuted” as well?!!! Da Fuck Type/Kind of Time is U Niggas really on?!!!

To Taqlīd or not to Taqlīd

Number-3:

All-8 of These-Madhāhib are Sharī`ah/Islāmic-Law Compliant:

In spite of any Ikhtilāf/Academic-Differring between These-Madhāhib…no one whom respects al-`Ilm/Knowledge can claim that any of these 8-Madhāhib are “Invalid” to follow. Never at any Point, via Islāmic-Academic History, have any of the 8-Surviving Madhāhib ever been declared “Outta-Pocket”. So, even if you decide to pick any Madhab to follow from the 8-Surviving Madhāhib-You mean to tell me that one is now “Hujjahworthy”, because they don’t adhere to Madhāhib which someone else favors over Other-Madhāhib?!!! Are you Niggas serious rite now?!!!

The Statements of Allah vs. the Statements of “The Scholars”: The Anatomy of Personality-Worship amongst Muslims towards “Persons-Of-Knowledge”

This is literally Religio-Academic `Ubūdah/Slavery

Principally, there’s literally 0-Farīdah/Mandate for any Muslim to adhere to any Madhab/Legal-School anyway. Realistically, the Entire-Point of al-Hujjah/Refutation is to call-out those whom’re Religio-Slippin.

Religio-Slippin = Impiety

Claiming that any Muslim is Non-Pious, because they don’t adhere to a Madhab is al-Jahālah/Sucka-Shit.

The Religio-Pathology known as Religio-Academic Feudalism

Controversy behind This-Article, because there will be

The Work via ibn-Rajab, itself, sets a Negative-Muqaddimah/Precedent. As is obvious, if/whenever one wants to condemn a Fellow-Muslim: they’ll resort to Works like these. And, it’s because they’re authored via such Respected Religio-Academics. And, because so/too many Muslims are addicted to “Shaykh-Culture”, they’ll just Dick-Ride their Way to any Hujjah/Refutation against anyone they want…they’ll simply reference Works of Notable Religio-Academics. And, then, Other Dick-Riders will say: “They Shaykh said: ‘Yada, Yada, Yada’.” implying that it must be Truth/Honesty just because Fulān-Fulān/So&So said.

You’ll never Dick-Ride any “Scholar” if you know your Fathers

How/why is Madhab-Choice even anyone’s Business?!!!

Personally, I don’t give a Fuck whom chooses to adopt any Madhab or no Madhab. So long as one is Theologically-Muslim, then they Good wit me. At the Same-Time: I’d never disrespect any Fellow-Muslim via implying, claiming, etc. that they’re Hujjahworthy (because they don’t adhere to any Madhab or because they don’t adhere to any “4-Madhāhib”). That’s simply Mothafuckin-Ridiculous. To attempt pressuring any Fellow-Muslim into any Madhab/Madhāhib-Box: that’s sum Hoe-Ass Shit. And, whomever co-signs this is a Hoe-Ass Nigga. Just as the Ole-Saying goes: “If you co-sign Sucka-Shit, then you’re a Sucka too.”. Realistically, this exclusively stems from Muslims fiending for Influence/Control over Fellow-Muslims.

Vying for the “Sunnī-Monopoly” amongst the Muslims

Let’s talk more indepthly about Muslim-On-Muslim Domination

Literally, the Easiest-Way for Muslims to control Fellow-Muslims is via Islāmic-Info./Knowledge and/or the Illusion thereof. There’s been Countless Persons-Of-Knowledge, Religio-Academic Charlatans, etc. whom merely want Pussy&Power within Muslim-Communities/Societies. And, they achieve their Marām/Agenda via everything I’ve aforementioned. So, my Challenge is to work towards minimizing and/or completely eradicating such a Religio-Vice amongst the Muslims. This “Hujjah/Refutation-Culture” amingst the Muslims, via the Ghurūr/Illusion of: “Knowledge”, “Correct-Creed”, “Ideology”, Methodology, etc. is like being bombared with Multiple-Types of Cancer at the Same-Time…all with the Same-Marām: to establish Dominance over Others for Religio-Personal Gains.

The “People-Of-Knowledge” Pseudo-Narrative & Pseudo-Monopoly according to Muslims

Leave People alone

Cut the Bullshit…stop trying to control the Religio-Lives of the Muslims. Let they Muslims be Muslims: free from the Desires of Others to control the Other via Religio-Slavery.

Gareth Bryant



57 responses to “Refutation against the Propagation of the “4-Madhāhib/Schools” Mythos”

  1. The ibadhiyah are khawarij. Theyre a misguided sect in terms of creed who deny the believers seeing Allah in the hereafter as well as holding that a Muslim who commits major sins and doesn’t repent will stay in hell forever .

    The jaafiri madhhab is the one used by the 12er shia (الاثناعشرية ألإمامية), which is an extremely misguided sect upon kufr.

    It’s not correct to claim these are valid madhahib to follow . They are madhahib of aqeedah, not just fiqh.

    The Zaydis are the closest of the shia to ahlussunnah, but are still innovators, so again it’s incorrect to call it a valid acceptable madhhab and present it along with the madhahib of ahlussunnah.

    1. You’re 💯%-Delusional.

      1. About what ?

        1. About everything you pontificated.

    2. Being a Person of the Qiblah
      is more important than being
      a “Person of the Sunnah”.

      https://www.gbwrites.com/qiblahvssunnah/

    3. Trying to “monopolize” the Sunnah:

      💯%-Hypocritical

      https://gbwrites.com/sunnimonopoly/

      1. So there aren’t specific beliefs which make a person not on the sunnah?

        Whats actually your point ?

        1. #UnpopularFact

          Sūfīs, Shī`īs, Salafīs, etc. literally
          have the Same Judeo-Christian
          Usūl/Origins.

          https://gbwrites.com/muslimsimitatingjudeochristians/

  2. So you have such a problem with and fixation on the people you write about obsessively on here , but not with alrafidhah and actual khawarij ( not just throwing the word around loosely that anyone who criticizes you is somehow a khariji).

    That’s too far out to even bother with then.

    هدانا الله و اياكم

    1. Persons like you are precisely
      like those whom you criticize…
      …just like the Ole-Saying:

      “Every Accusation is a Confession.”

  3. You also argued about

    “Al Makkah “

    “Mahroom”

    Anything else youre just wrong about. That’s a personality trait of someone you can’t advise , who cant accept any sort of correction. And what’s worse is you immediately resort to name calling , personal insults, and extremely foul words directed at other Muslims .

    You don’t see the problem with saying to be open minded towards all ahl al Qiblah but go nuts on anybody who disagrees with or criticizes anything you say, even when it’s so obviously wrong like the misuse of a word ?

    Anyone who disagrees with your articles is automatically a khariji but Al Ibadhiyah who are actual khawarij because of holding points of creed which make on a khariji are cool in your book ?

    Even Al shia Al ithna’ashariyah, with clear beliefs of kufr , but you’re obsessed with trying to tear up whoever in Philadelphia, while claiming how some other people are obsessed with other Muslims .

    You don’t see the contradiction and problem with this ?

    1. The Word “Mahrūm” literally means
      the same as “Harām”…what’s actually
      your Point?!!!

      1. It just doesn’t . You wrote all that about dictionaries take your own advice

        1. حَرام: (اسم)
          الجمع : حُرُم
          الحَرام : محرَّم، شيء ممنوع فعله؛ لا يحلُّ انتهاكُه، عكسه حلال

          مَحْروم: (اسم)
          مَحْروم : اسم المفعول من حَرَمَ
          مَحروم: (اسم)
          مفعول مِنْ حَرَمَ
          المَحْرُوم : الشّقيّ الذي لا يصيب خيرًا من وجه يتوجَّه إِليه

          1. كلامك نفسه يدلّ على أنّ المعنيين مختلفان.
            فقد عرّفتَ حرام بأنّه “شيءٌ ممنوعٌ فعله”، وهذا حكمٌ على الفعل أو الشيء.
            وعرّفتَ محروم بأنّه “اسمُ مفعولٍ من حَرَمَ” و“الذي لا يُصيب خيرًا”، وهذا وصفٌ لشخصٍ مُنع أو حُرم من شيء.
            فكيف يكونان بمعنى واحد؟ هذا يدلّ على أنّ بينهما فرقًا واضحًا:
            الأوّل حكمٌ بالمنع، والثاني حالةُ حرمانٍ تقع على الإنسان.
            كما أنّ الاستعمال يؤكّد هذا الفرق؛ فيُقال: الخمرُ حرام، ولا يُقال: الخمرُ محروم. ويُقال: هو محرومٌ من المال، ولا يُقال: هو حرامٌ من المال.
            فبذلك يتبيّن أنّهما ليسا مترادفين، وإن اشتركا في الأصل.

          2. You literally proved my Entire-Point:

            “Mahrūm” & “Harām” share the
            Same-Definitions/Meanings.

          3. Do you even understand what you just pasted ? It says what I’m
            Saying . The opposite of what you claimed

          4. No…it doesn’t:

            Both “Mahrūm” & “Harām” mean
            the Same-Thing…they’re both
            Synonyms of one another.

          5. You clearly don’t even understand what you posted .

            It doesn’t mean what you keep saying it does .

            Nowhere does it say they’re synonyms.

            It says mahroom is ism maf’ool.

            Haram is not .

            That changes the entire meaning and how you can use the words .

            Mahroom means prevented FROM something , denied or deprived OF something .

            I’ve demonstrated this to you so many times , but you refuse even a basic point of language , so how will you accept anything else?

            It’s so easy to check . Even what you pasted as an argument shows what I’m saying but you can’t understand it yourself .

          6. “Harām” & “Mahrūm” mean
            the Same-Thing.

      2. حرام means something is forbidden. محروم means someone is deprived or denied something. One is describing a thing or action, the other is describing a person’s situation.
        If you actually try to use them the same way it falls apart immediately. You can say الخمر حرام, but you can’t say الخمر محروم. And you can say هو محروم من المال, but you can’t say هو حرام من المال.
        So yeah, same root, completely different meaning. Not interchangeable.

        1. Completely-Interchangeable:

          “Mahrūm” & “Harām” both mean:

          Sanctified, Forbidden, Prohibited, etc.

          You’ve proven that you don’t even
          care how Pathologically-Ignorant
          you actually are.

          Apathy is worse than Ignorance.

          1. Well at least now anyone who stumbles onto this mess can see how even when it’s a point of grammar where there’s zero difference of opinion, yiure just ignorant , wrong and cant accept correction .

            You don’t even understand the words you copied and pasted . If you did, they show that they’re not interchangeable and don’t mean the same thing . Switching the words would produce nonsensical statements .

            Like your writing.

          2. “Mahrūm” & “Harām” mean&represent
            the Same-Thing, Same-Meanings, etc.

      3. This entire blog should just be called gbmisunderstands

        You have a tendency to misunderstand things , then go off ranting about them , and if anyone says anything you just resort to insults and slander .

        1. You’ve literally done precisely
          what you’ve accused me of…
          …just like the Ole-Saying:

          “Every Accusation is a Confession.”

      4. The point is I want people to see that if even something as open/shut as the definition of a word is a big problem for you, and you don’t have the humility to just admit when you’re wrong instead of doubling down on it , they should be very skeptical of your other claims on here .

        Gareth is just somebody who doesn’t know what he’s talking about, but found an opening in the vacuum of Muslim voices in NYC to pose as someone knowledgeable.

        He’s the furthest thing from that .

        So don’t be fooled. Anyone with any background in any of the things he tries to talk about can instantly see he’s not even qualified to be in the discussion.

        He throws all this Arabic around but doesn’t have even basic understanding.

        So don’t be fooled .

        1. You’re a Bozo&Hater via Real-Life…
          …you’re a Bitch-Ass-Nigga.

          1. Youre a one trick pony who resorts to schoolyard insults whenever you’re criticized for just not knowing what you’re talking about .

            Just grow up already

          2. #HypocriticalIrony

            Neither you, nor anyone like you,
            can “refute” any of my Writings.

            You and those like you are
            Bozos via Real-Life.

  4. The dictionary refutes you .

    Nobody else even needs to .

    This behavior of not accepting even an obvious fact which no two people disagree on shows anyone what they need to know about you.

    1. “Mahrūm” & “Harām” mean
      the Same-Thing.

      1. They’re different words, different grammar, different meaning. You can’t swap them, and Arabic usage doesn’t support it at all.
        If someone is mixing those up, then they’re simply not speaking accurately enough to lecture others on finer points or “refute scholars.”

        1. “Mahrūm” & “Harām” both
          mean the Same-Thing.

      2. You’re calling “maḥrūm” and “ḥarām” the same thing, but they’re not even close. One means forbidden, the other means deprived OF something .

        That’s basic Arabic, not some deep debate. If that part is wrong, then everything you’re building on top of it isn’t worth taking seriously

        1. Whatever point you think you’re making about madhhabs or scholars gets completely lost when every disagreement turns into insults and slurs. That alone shows this isn’t a serious discussion. I’ve already seen enough to know there’s nothing productive to continue here, so I’m done engaging.

          1. #WhateverNigga

            Go suck a Dhakar/Dick.

        2. “Harām” & “Mahrūm” mean
          the Same-Thing.

  5. All this because you never got over that time at Masjid Al Muslimeen what 2 decades ago ?

    1. You’re a Sectarian-Bozo,
      via Real-Life.

  6. It reads like the same style people point out with Trump

    You just keeps repeating your point, ignore corrections, and when you get challenged you switch to insults instead of actually addressing what’s being said.

    1. #WhatevaNigga

      Go suck a Dhakar/Dick.

      1. Keep the homoerotic imagery to yourself

        1. Go suck a Dhakar/Dick.

  7. just an insult meant to provoke and derail the conversation when you’re frustrated or losing the thread

    1. #HypocriticalIrony

      You & those like you still can’t
      “refute” any of my Writings.

      1. You can’t even understand the dictionary you copied and pasted , which refutes you .

        Nobody even needs to try .

        1. You’re a Hoe-Ass-Sectarian,
          via Real-Life…you’re a Bozo.

  8. Maybe if you didn’t wear that snowman T-shirt with the cherry on top hairdo and tight jeans you wouldn’t even be talking like this today .

    Was that outfit really worth all this

    1. Go suck a Dhakar/Dick.

      1. Keep that homoerotic talk to yourself

        1. Go suck a Dhakar/Dick.

      2. This is what passes for a “khateeb “ nowadays smh

        1. Go suck a Dhakar/Dick.

          1. اعوذبالله

          2. Persons like you are
            Tullāb-ish-Shaytān
            (Pupils-Of-Satan):

            https://gbwrites.com/pupilsofsatan/

Leave a Reply to Gareth Bryant Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *