Gareth Bryant Writes

I write therefore I am/I am what I write


The Abrahamic-Fallacy

Jordan Peterson discussing the “Abraham-Accords”:

For More-Info. about the “Abraham-Accords”:

Muslims Celebrate Shavuot – And Have Been Doing so for Hundreds of Years!

The Concepts “Abrahamism”, “Abrahamic”, “Abrahamic-Faiths/Religions”, etc. which predicates further the Mythos/Pseudo-Narrative that Muslims&Jews are “Cousins” are 💯%-Untruth/Dishonesty. These-Concepts exclusively exist via the “Interfaith-Dialogue” Mythos: the so-called Consolidation of Muslims, Jews, Christians. However, anyone whom knows anything truly about any of these 3 Religio-Spiritual Paths, Religions, Faiths, etc. knows that they’re very much different unto themselves. I plan to undoubtedly debunk These-Concepts. Honestly, they’re very simple/easy to do so. There’s Several-Ways which I intend to accomplish this.

The Proofs against “Abrahamism/Abrahamic”:

Abraham (Peace be upon them), commonly falsely credited as being the “1st-Monotheist” via the Interfaith-Mythos. This has historically set the Theological-Tone/Stage to pontificate/promote the Mythos of “Abrahamic-Religions”, in the so-called Chronological-Order with Judaism being “First”, Christianity being “Second”, al-Islām being “Third”. an-Nuzūl/Revelatory-Texts undoubtedly proves otherwise, as Allah states, “And Adam was taught the Names of all.”
(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.2, V.31)

This establishes 2-Things:

a. This is a Revelatory-Textual Proof, that Adam: the Progenitor/Patriarch-Of-Humanity (Peace be upon them) was directly taught by Allah & by definition that affirms/confirms their Maqām/Status of being a Nabī/Prophetic-Individual. Likewise, it equally affirms/confirms that they were the 1st Muslim-Human: it’s literally impossible for someone to be directly taught by the Creator/Lord of the Universe & not submit to Them and ironically that’s literally what al-Islām means “Submission to Allah”.
(Lisān-ul-`Arab: Lexicon of the Arabic-Language, ibn-Manzhūr)

b. This completely debunks the Pontification/Claim that al-Islām is a Religio-Historical-Branch of Judeo-Christianity. Likewise, it completely disproves the Mythos/Pseudo-Narrative of al-Islām being a 7th-Century, C.E. Arabian-Inception/Invention.

The Proofs against “Abrahamic-Faiths/Religions” Kalām/Rhetoric:

https://youtu.be/XAyXrRRkADg

Basically, Abraham is considered to be the “Founder of Judaism” sort-of-speak & then Christianity branched-off from Judaism, and then al-Islām branched-off from both Judaism & Christianity jointly. This is both a Religio&Secularly-Acceptable View, sadly even amongst Muslims. an-Nuzūl dismisses This-Claim, as Allah states Word4Word that Abraham was a Muslim & that they weren’t amongst the Shirkers.
(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.2, V.135; Chpt.3, V.67&95; Chpt.6, V.79&161; Chpt.16, V.123)

What’s a “Shirker”?

Good-Question…Answer: a Shirker, which is English for the Word Mushrik, means to commit what’s known as ash-Shirk/Association. ash-Shirk means to attribute, ascribe, etc. any Sifah (Characteristic/Quality) to Allah which isn’t directly predicated upon at-Tanzīl/Revelation.
(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.18, V.1-6; Chpt.112; Lisān-ul-`Arab)

What does this have to do with the Subject?

Good-Question…Answer: principally anyone/everyone whom isn’t a Muslim is classified as a Mushrik/Shirker by default, including Jews&Christians.

How/why: Jews&Christians are Monotheistic aren’t they?!!!

Good-Question…Answer: Both Jews&Christians principally violate what’s known as at-Tawhīd/Oneness, which is the Polar-Opposite of what ash-Shirk is. So, as per the Islāmic-Definition of Monotheism: Jews&Christians don’t apply.
(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.6, V.151; Chpt.17, V.22-43; Lisān-ul-`Arab)

There’s Specific-Things which’re Part of Judeo-Christianity which is classified as ash-Shirk. For example: pontificating/claiming that Allah has Parents and/or Children…this is ash-Shirk by definition. Parents are imperfect, and Children must be constantly/consistently taught & reminded of Things. Children typically need their Parents for everything, while Parents rely upon their Children to care for them when they age. Parents can be & often are wrong about Lots of Things. Regardless of whether it’s a Figurative-Context or Literal-Context…it’s Islāmically-Intolerable/Unacceptable. There’s even Several-Texts via Judeo-Christian Sources (The Tanakh/Torah, The Bible, etc.) which pontificates/promotes ash-Shirk: Adam being called “Son of God” (Luke), Jacob/Israel being called “My 1st-Born” (Exodus), Angels being called “Children/Sons of God” (Job), David&Solomon being called “Sons of God” (Psalms&Chronicles I), etc. Ironically, even ash-Shaytān is classified as a “Child-Of-God”, because as per Judeo-Christianity ash-Shaytān is Religio-Classified as a “Fallen-Angel” & Angels are Religio-Classified via Judeo-Christianity as the “Children-Of-God”.
(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.5, V.18&64; Chpt.9, V.30; Chpt.18 V.1-6; Chpt.112)

www.forward.com/news/1743/jewish-paganism-oxymoron-or-innovation/

https://www.sefaria.org

www.jenkins.sbts.edu/2021/07/15/should-christians-use-the-quranic-name-of-jesus-in-arabic-bible-translations/

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/14bKRLFo9m/?mibextid=wwXIfr

Well how/why are Jews&Christians mentioned as “People of the Book” & how/why are Judeo-Christian Scriptures mentioned in The Qur’ān?

Good-Question…Answer: Well…to be 💯% there’s a Difference between “Banī-Isrā’īl/Children-Of-Israel” and “Yahūd/Jews”. Banū-Isrā’īl were the Patrilineal-Descendants of Ya`qūb-Isrā’īl/Jacob-Israel (Peace be upon them) whom were Muslims prior to the Revelation of The Qur’ān, via the Tanzīl/Revelation given to any/all the Anbiyā’/Prophetic-Individuals sent to Banī-Isrā’īl (Peace be upon them). The Term “Yahūd”, often translated as “Jew/Jewish-Person” literally means “Guidance-Rejectors”. And, this is a Title which Allah personally imposed upon Demographics of the Children-Of-Israel whom rejected & plotted to assassinate `Īsā/Jesus-Christ (Peace be upon them). Jews&Christians are called “Ahl-al-Kitāb/People of the Book”, exclusively because they lay claim to the Fellowship of Prophetic-Individuals whom were given Books-Of-Revelation namely: The Torah, The Psalms, The Gospel. This doesn’t mean at all that al-Islām regards Muslims, Jews, Christians as Religio-Theological Equals.
(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.2, V.132&133; at-Tabarī; as-Suyūtī; ibn-Kathīr; Lisān-ul-`Arab)

This-Video is pontificated/claimed by Judeo-Christian Academics, Theologians, etc. whom’re adamant concerning Judeo-Christian Islāmophobia.

Well…where do we go from here?

Good-Question…Answer: Muslims must cease buying into the Mythos of “Abrahamism/Abrahamic”, and be truthful/honest pertaining to what the Islāmic-Posture towards Judeo-Christianity really is. Realistically, Interfaith-Dialogue shouldn’t mean Religio-Hypocrisy/Dishonesty. No Muslim should have to think/feel that they must lie, be dishonest, etc. regarding to what Islāmic-Texts states about Judeo-Christian Theology. Unfortunately, Muslims buy into what Judeo-Christianity “has in common” with al-Islām, under the Illusion of Coexistence/Cohesion. In All-Reality: our Differences matter more than whatever our Commonalities could possibly be, because those are Religio-Theological Differences. This is coupled with the Fact that Allah directly details that Jews&Christians have altered the Books-Of-Revelation which they pontificate/claim to follow.
(Chpt.2, V.75&79, 174; Chpt.3 V.78&187; Chpt.4, V.46; Chpt.5, V.12-15; Chpt.6, V.91; Chpt.7, V.162)

Gareth Bryant



9 responses to “The Abrahamic-Fallacy”

  1. There’s a huge difference between sons of God and the only Begotten Son .The latter is only claimed of Christ..even in your scripture you credited to King David is a well known fact that is not spoken about Him but is a Messianic prophecy of the Messiah..same one as a Son will be born or given in the Old Testament.. Although parents are flawed ( who are humans) God is not …Also angels ate never called sons of God.. that’s scripture.. Reference to such is prophetic (same as the words of King David)..after all angels are minister spirit. You also error in Bible scriptures on Oneness .when it applies to God in is never in the language of a single individual
    ( That’s obvious with Elohim) but it’s in plural
    form (similarly applied to men and women in marriage. They shall be one).. We see this in GOD’S creation ..in Genesis..let US make man in OUR image. Why God is addressed three times as Holy Holy Holy. Holy.. acknowledgement of all three

    1. Persons like you prove what I always tell People: Apathy is worse than Ignorance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *