What’s the “Islāmic-Dilemma” anyway?!!!



Hypocritical-Irony regarding Claim that Qur’ān is “False”

The Qur’ān never “affirms” The Bible.
The Bible never stated/claimed that The Qur’ān is “False”.
The Word “Qur’ān” is never mentioned via The Bible.
“Bible” is an English-Word, which is directly derived/borrowed from Greek/Latin.
There’s never been any Revelatory-Texts revealed via either Greek or Latin.
“Bible” is never mentioned via The Qur’ān.
“The Bible” isn’t even a Revelatory-Book, rather it’s the Remnants of Revelatory-Texts (namely The Torah, The Psalms, The Gospel).
The Qur’ān was revealed 4-Centuries prior to the Inception/Invention of the English-Language (the Same-Language where the Word “Bible” comes from).
Hypocritical-Irony regarding the Pseudo-Justification of Judeo-Christian Theology (via the Trinity)
Adam is claimed to be
a “Son-Of-God”.
(Luke)
Jacob-Israel is claimed
to be “God’s 1st-Born”.
(Exodus)
David&Solomon are claimed
to be “Sons-Of-God”.
(Chronicles II)
Satan is claimed to be a “Son-Of-God”, due to the False-Claim that Satan is a “Fallen-Angel”, based on the False-Claim that Angels are “Sons-Of-God”.
(Job)
Christianity:
40%-Judaism
40%-Paganism
20% Miscellaneous-Bullshit
https://gbwrites.com/yahudmeansguidancerejector/
Hypocritical-Irony regarding “Biblical-Figures”
1. Hawwā’/Eve being accused of being a “Temptress”, causing the Downfall of Ādam/Adam: the Progenitor/Patriarch-Of-Humanity. This is clearly meant to be a Misogynistic-Trope against Women, via Judeo-Christianity.
2. Noah being accused of imposing a “Curse” upon their Son Ham, which targetted the Afro-Descendants of Ham. This is clearly a Xenophobic-Stab at Afro-Peoples, via White-Supremacy, via Judeo-Christianity.
3. Abraham being accused of having a “Bastard-Child” in Ishmael (Peace be upon them both). This is clearly meant to attempt discrediting the Nubuwwah/Prophethood of Muhammad, being that Muhammad is a Descendant of Ishmael.
4. Lot being accused of offering their Biological-Daughters to be used as Sex-Toys for the Men amongst the People-Of-Lot. This is clearly meant to portray Lot as a “Pervert”, “Pimp”, etc.
5. Joseph was directly falsely accused of al-Ightisāb/Rape, and literally served 13-Years in Prison for it, via Misr/Kemet (Ancient-Egypt).
6. Saul being accused of being “envious” of David and trying to murder David. This is clearly meant to portray Bias against Certain-Prophetics deem “Unfavorables” according to Judeo-Christianity.
7. David being accused of sending a Man to the Battlefield, to die, in order to seize the Man’s-Wife. This is clearly meant to portray David as a Sexual-Deviant via Judeo-Christianity.
8. Solomon being accused of worshipping Idols via their Geriatric-Years. This is clearly meant to disrespect the Prophetic-Integrity of Solomon, via Judeo-Christianity.
Atharī Corleone’s Most Wanted: Judeo-Christian Lies against al-Anbiyā’ (Prophetic-Individuals) that every Muslim must know
Hypocritical-Irony regarding the “Controversy” about the Marriage between Muhammad and `Ā’ishah
According to the Catholic-Encyclopedia: at the Time of Jesus (Peace be upon him) & even prior to his Lifetime, Females were considered marriageable via Age-12, yet Marital-Ages varied circumstantially. Marriages were preceded by the Betrothal, after which the Bride legally belonged to the Bridegroom, though she did not live with him till about 1-Year later, when the Marriage used to be celebrated.
https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15464b.htm
This is agreed upon, as per Judeo-Christian/Religio-Historical Sources & practiced in Palestine even up until the early 20th-Century, C.E. According to Alma White (A Biblical-Historian) & confirmed by W.M. Thompson (The Land and the Book, W.M. Thompson), “Some Customs of ‘Biblical-Palestine’ continued through the Centuries.”-After her Trip to the Middle-East (Circa 1910, C.E.): Alma White made Commentary on the Age-Of-Marriage in Palestine, “A Female is usually married via her 12th/10th-Year, and sometimes as early as via her 10th-Year.”.
According to James Neil (Everyday Life in the Holy Land, James Neil), Women of that Time-Period (in Palestine) were even married as young as Age-9:
a. https://gbwrites.com/thechildmarriageissue
b. https://www.truthortradition.com/articles/mary-a-teenage-bride-and-mother
As per Judeo-Christian Religio-Sources, as those which I’ve already cited…according to these Sources, it’s claimed/assumed that Mary (Peace be upon her):
a. Had Several-Children with a Man named “Joseph”.
b. Never had Children with anyone named “Joseph”, yet was “married” to him (completely denying that she gave Birth to Jesus-Christ without Sexual-Intercourse).
c. Gave Birth to Jesus-Christ, yet had no Other-Children thereafter.
d. That she was between 12 & 16 Years-Of-Age when this took place.
e. That “Joseph” was Significantly-Older than she was, anywhere between his Late-Teens to Late-Sixties.
Dear Islāmophobes (specifically those whom’re Judeo-Christian)
Hypocritical-Irony regarding the Pseudo-Claim that The Qur’ān isn’t Pure-Arabic.

Gabriel Said Reynolds made a Ridiculous-Claim, that The Qur’ān isn’t Pure-Arabic. Their Claim is based upon their Argument that Several-Words were “borrowed” from Other-Languages. The Words claimed to be from “Other-Languages” are: “Iblīs”, “Injīl”, “Qur’ān”, “Tābūt”. So, let’s see about that.
(Literally) all the Words mentioned, via the Video made by Gabriel Said Reynolds, are actually derived from the Arabic-Language directly (I can/will prove as such):
“Iblīs” (an Alternate-Name for ash-Shaytān/Satan) comes from the Arabic-Verb “Ablasa”, meaning: “To refuse”, “To rebel”, “To disobey”, etc. However, via the Video: it’s falsely-claimed that “Iblīs” is “borrowed” from the Greek-Word “Diablos”. There’s literally 0 Linguistic/Historical-Proof of such a Claim.
“Injīl” (the Title of the Book-Of-Revelation imposed upon Jesus-Christ [Peace be upon them]) comes from the Arabic-Verb “Najala/Najila”, meaning: “To originate”, “To birth”, etc. However, via the Video: it’s falsely-claimed that “Injīl”comes from Greek. Such a Claim nothing less than Bogus. There’s literally 0 Linguistic/Historical-Proof of such a Claim.
“Qur’ān” (the Title of the Book-Of-Revelation imposed upon Muhammad [Peace be upon them]) comes from the Arabic-Verb “Qara’a”, meaning: “To read”, “To recite”, “To explore”, “To discover”, etc. However, via the Video: it’s falsely-claimed that “Qur,’ān” comes from Hebrew. There’s literally 0 Linguistic/Historical-Proof of such a Claim.*
*Just for Fun…”Tawrāh” (the Title of the Book-Of-Revelation imposed on Moses [Peace be upon them]) comes from the Arabic-Verb “Warā”, meaning: “To light”, “To ignite”, “To kindle”, etc.
“Tābūt” comes from the Arabic-Verb “Tāba”, meaning: “To refine” “To reform”, “To repent”, etc. However, via the Video: it’s falsely-claimed that “Tābūt” comes from Hebrew. There’s literally 0 Linguistic/Historical-Proof of such a Claim.
(Lisān-ul-`Arab: Lexixon of the Arabic-Language, ibn-Manzhūr)
Atharī Corleone’s Most-Wanted: Gabriel Said Reynolds
The Mythos/Fallacy via the Claim that The Qur’ān has “Multiple-Versions” like The Bible has

Very often, via Judeo-Christian Guilt, Judeo-Christians attempt to equate the Inauthenticity of The Bible with the Human-Preservation of The Qur’ān. Ironically, The Qur’ānic-Text has exclusively been documented the Same-Ways via the Same-Language for 14-Centuries. Now, obviously, the Same-Thing can’t be said about The Bible:
From Hebrew/Aramaic to Greek
From Greek to Latin
From Latin to English
etc.
The Bible (ironically) has a Lineal-Shift of Religio-Linguistic Dominance relative to Conquests, Nation-States/Empires rising/falling, and so on.
Qur’ān-Recitation History
To conclude…as per all which I’ve articulated:
Who actually has the “Dilemma”?!!!
#IllWait
Gareth Bryant
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.