al-Muqaddimah/Prelude
This-Risālah/Article is predicated upon a Public-Discussion I had with Paul Williams (Founder of Blogging Theology). It was during a Q&A after they had spoken of the Theological-Flaws of Judeo-Christianity, which they conveyed quite accurately/honestly for the Record. However, something which Paul Williams stated which truly caught my Attention, that I just couldn’t let slide or go over my Head: it was Paul Williams co-signing the Judeo-Christian Fallacy that Maryam/Mary (Peace be upon them) had “Other-Children” after their Miraculous-Pregnancy as a Virgin, birthing Jesus-Christ (Peace be upon them). This literally screams “Red-Flag”.
https://youtube.com/@bloggingtheology?si=I_d0zfDF5Rcc7Osq
Reasons how/why this can’t be taken seriously
1. Such a Claim doesn’t come from the Nuzūl/Revelatory-Texts which Allah sent to Muhammad (Peace be upon them): such a Claim has literally 0-Appearance via al-Qur’ān (Recitable-Revelation), nor via as-Sunnah (Prophetic-Tradition).
2. Jews&Christians have been religio-historically known to tell Lies against Allah, even prior to the Revelation of The Qur’ān, via ash-Shirk/Association (Paul Williams of Blogging Theology ironically detailed this at length).
3. Jews&Christians have been religio-historically known to alter, change, omit, add, etc. Things to the Religio-Texts which they lay claim to (Paul Williams of Blogging Theology ironically detailed this at length).
4. Jews&Christians have been religio-historically known to tell Lies against al-Anbiyā’/Prophetics (Peace be upon them altogether).
https://gbwrites.com/2025/09/01/regarding-at-tabari-6111/
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1KmZRC3n6U/
https://gbwrites.com/2025/07/21/yahudmeansguidancerejector/
How/why is Lying upon al-Anbiyā’/Prophetics so Islāmically-Serious/Severe?!!!
The Role of al-Anbiyā’ (Prophetics/Prophetic-Individuals) are a Crucial-Core within al-Islām. This is precisely how/why Beluef in ar-Rusul (Messengers) are amongst the Arkān/Pillars of al-Īmān (Faith). It’s literally a Part of al-`Aqīdah/Islāmic-Theology, to believe in al-Anbiyā’ and anything told about them which is False is al-Kufr/Disbelief.
Amthāl/Examples of Lies against al-Anbiyā’
There’s Specific-Things which’re Part of Judeo-Christianity which is classified as ash-Shirk. For example: pontificating/claiming that Allah has “Parents” and/or “Children”…this is ash-Shirk by definition. Parents are imperfect, and Children must be constantly/consistently taught & reminded of Things. Children typically need their Parents for everything, while Parents rely upon their Children to care for them when they age. Parents can be & often are wrong about Lots of Things. Regardless of whether it’s a Figurative-Context or Literal-Context…it’s Islāmically-Intolerable/Unacceptable. There’s even Several-Texts via Judeo-Christian Sources (The Tanakh/Torah, The Bible, etc.) which pontificates/promotes ash-Shirk: Adam being called “Son of God” (Luke), Jacob/Israel being called “My 1st-Born” (Exodus), Angels being called “Children/Sons of God” (Job), David&Solomon being called “Sons of God” (Psalms&Chronicles I), etc. Ironically, even ash-Shaytān is classified as a “Child-Of-God”, because as per Judeo-Christianity ash-Shaytān is Religio-Classified as a “Fallen-Angel” & Angels are Religio-Classified via Judeo-Christianity as the “Children-Of-God”.
(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.5, V.18&64; Chpt.9, V.30; Chpt.18 V.1-6; Chpt.112)
https://gbwrites.com/2025/05/16/liesagainstanbiya/
Swinging-Back to the Claim that Mary had “Other/Multiple-Children”
Quite frankly, such a Claim would completely (if at all true):
1. Debunk the Status of Mary being a Virgin and having a Virgin-Pregnancy/Birth.
2. Debunk the Status of Jesus as a Nabī/Prophetic, a Rasūl/Messenger, al-Masīh/the Christ, etc.
3. Prove what al-Yahūd/the Jews claim about Mary committing az-Zinā/THOTery and about Jesus being a Bastard-Child.
Now, obviously, none of the aforementioned is true. We know this, because the Virginity-Of-Mary was exclusively preserved by Allah via barring/banning them from ever getting married. And, it was through this that the Suspicion about the “Father-Of-Jesus” is proven to be unwarranted. Because, realistically, if Mary weren’t a Virgin, was married, had “Other/Multiple-Children”, etc.: it’d literally be impossible to prove that the Birth-Of-Jesus was directly connected with their Status as a Nabī, a Rasūl, al-Masīh, etc. Furthermore, there’s Revelatory-Texts (via as-Sunnah/Prophetic-Tradition) affirming/confirming that Mary will be the Wife-Of-Muhammad in al-Jannah/Paradise.
(at-Tabarī, at-Tabarānī, ibn-Hajar al-`Asqalānī, al-Hākim, ibn-`Asākir, ibn-Kathīr)
Swinging-Back to Lies against al-Anbiyā’
1. Hawwā’/Eve being accused of being a “Temptress”, causing the Downfall of Ādam/Adam: the Progenitor/Patriarch-Of-Humanity. This is clearly meant to be a Misogynistic-Trope against Women, via Judeo-Christianity.
2. Noah being accused of imposing a “Curse” upon their Son Ham, which targetted the Afro-Descendants of Ham. This is clearly a Xenophobic-Stab at Afro-Peoples, via White-Supremacy, via Judeo-Christianity.
3. Abraham being accused of having a “Bastard-Child” in Ishmael (Peace be upon them both). This is clearly meant to attempt discrediting the Nubuwwah/Prophethood of Muhammad, being that Muhammad is a Descendant of Ishmael.
4. Lot being accused of offering their Biological-Daughters to be used as Sex-Toys for the Men amongst the People-Of-Lot. This is clearly meant to portray Lot as a “Pervert”, “Pimp”, etc.
5. Saul being accused of being “envious” of David and trying to murder David. This is clearly meant to portray Bias against Certain-Prophetics deem “Unfavorables” according to Judeo-Christianity.
6. David being accused of sending a Man to the Battlefield, to die, in order to seize the Man’s-Wife. This is clearly meant to portray David as a Sexual-Deviant via Judeo-Christianity.
7. Solomon being accused of worshipping Idols via their Geriatric-Years. This is clearly meant to disrespect the Prophetic-Integrity of Solomon, via Judeo-Christianity.
Neither al-Qur’ān nor as-Sunnah support any of the Aforementioned-Claims. And, by default/definition: the Aforementioned-Claims are Blatant-Lies. It’d litetally be impossible, for any Nabī/Prophetic-Individual to be guilty of any of the Aforementioned-Claims. at-Tanzīl/Revelation affirms/confirms the Uncontested-Integrity of al-Anbiyā’/Prophetic-Individuals (Peace be upon them altogether). As Muslims, we must be unfraid, unashamed, etc. to callout, correct, etc. these & any/all other Manifestations of Islāmophobia. Because to lie against Allah is Islāmophobia by default/definition, and to lie against any Prophetic-Individual is Islāmophobia by default/definition.
Gareth Bryant
Leave a Reply